Study warns on mobile location data privacy

Standard

Image links to BBC article

“The data used in such calculations are “anonymised” – no actual mobile numbers or personal details are associated with the data.”

“They found from the “mobility traces” – the evident paths of each mobile phone – that only four locations and times were enough to identify a particular user. “In the 1930s, it was shown that you need 12 points to uniquely identify and characterise a fingerprint,” said the study’s lead author Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye of MIT….Dr Hidalgo notes that additional information would still be needed to connect a mobility trace to an individual, but that users freely give away some of that information through geo-located tweets, location “check-ins” with applications such as Foursquare and so on….”We’ve really tried hard to not not frame this as a ‘Big Brother’ situation, as ‘we know everything about you’. But we show that even if there’s no name or email address it can still be personal data, so we need it to be treated accordingly.”

Advertisements

About D.Dinius

I am big on education, animals, and nature. So following that sentence I think it's important to be smart and animals and nature bring clarity and a calmness to things. I am new to actually paying attention and having opinions. This has been building well for about the last year. :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s